Latest Lifestyle

Latest from Lifestyle

May 17, 2019

Living with your dog

by Bethany Wilson
May 07, 2019

Common questions from dog owners before training:

by Bethany Wilson
May 02, 2019

Third Time’s the Charm.

by Jorge Perez
May 01, 2019

Free Angel Card Reading for May

by Annmari Love
April 30, 2019

4 Tips for choosing the right countertop

by Christopher Porikos
April 29, 2019

Free Monthly Horoscopes - May 2019 - Taurus

by Maya White
April 18, 2019

Managing an Additcted Parent

by Ask AC
April 02, 2019

Your FREE monthly Angel Card reading is here

by Annmari Love
April 01, 2019

Free Monthly Horoscopes - April 2019 - Aries

by Maya White
March 22, 2019


by Ask AC
March 15, 2019

My top three design elements

by Christopher Porikos
March 14, 2019

How to help teenagers manage their money

by Lillian Appleby
Thursday, 18 February 2010 02:05

The Last Station

Written by
Rate this item
(0 votes)

I enjoyed Michael Hoffman’s The Last Station when I was watching it, but as Lieutenant Columbo would say, I’ve got a problem. The basic plot concerns an aging Leo Tolstoy, his wife Countess Sofya, and the tense situation that arises when it becomes apparent that Tolstoy plans to leave his writings (and future royalties) to all of Russia–albeit in the care of Chertkov, an unctuous Tolstoy worshipper—rather than to his own privileged wife and family. 

This fierce three-way tug of war is unexpectedly complicated by another Tolstoy disciple who has arrived at Tolstoy’s estate (at Chertkov’s bidding) to spy on the couple. Here is my problem: Hoffman’s screenplay, based on Jay Parini’s novel (which is loosely based on Tolstoy’s last days) provides a set-up which leads to developments that are hardly plausible. Case in point: the Countess, both in the writing and in Helen Mirren’s playing, is so intelligent, so on to the devious Chertkov’s (cue mustache-twirling Paul Giammatti) machinations, and so aware of how to use her womanly wiles (damn, she still looks great) to get her wavering husband to listen to her—that the Countess’ subsequent repeated emotional tantrums that alienate Tolstoy are almost out of character. Additionally, Plummer’s Tolstoy seems so in love with his wife, so aware of his own failings, so aware of the sycophantic nature of the “Tolstoyan” movement, that his later decisions are hard to fathom. In spite of these caveats, there is much to enjoy: flavorful, full-bodied, even touching portrayals by Mirren and Plummer that try to overcome the script’s weaknesses; engaging performances (in a stock situation) from James McAvoy as the Chertkov pawn who turns on his master and Kerry Condon as Masha who helps McAvoy embrace the physical nature of love; and a convincing feel for the period. It’s worth a look—mainly for Mirren and Plummer.

Read 4015 times Last modified on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 06:33
Mike Peros

Mike Peros is an author whose new book, DAN DURYEA - HEEL WITH A HEART, the first biography of classic Hollywood's iconic villain, was recently published by the University Press of Mississippi.  He is  also an educator with a passion for movies ever since he saw John Wayne riding toward the bad guys, reins between his teeth, in TRUE GRIT.  Some of his favorite films include THE BAND WAGON, THE WILD BUNCH, OUT OF THE PAST, THE SILENT PARTNER, IT'S ALWAYS FAIR WEATHER ( a great musical--if you're a Gene Kelly fan, what are you waiting for?), and KONGA with the great Michael Gough.

More in this category: « Crazy Heart The Wolfman »

Leave a comment

Do you have an event, video or news to share?  Drop us an email and you may see it on