OUR BLOGGERS!

August 18, 2017

Jail People Who Mistreat Animals?

by Nancy Bianconi
August 14, 2017

New Frontiers, the Many Worlds of George Takei

by Raleigh Barrett
August 07, 2017

Six days on the Camino de Santiago

by NoHo - North Hollywood
August 07, 2017

6 Financial Tips for Your Aging Parents

by Lillian Appleby
August 02, 2017

Reviews of Dunkirk; The Big Sick

by Mike Peros
August 01, 2017

5 Dating Mistakes Men and Women Make

by Cristina Morara
July 31, 2017

Free Monthly Horoscopes - August 2017

by Maya White
July 25, 2017

Three Essential Interior Design Must Haves

by Christopher Porikos
July 24, 2017

INTERVIEW WITH PAUL STORIALE

by Waide Aaron Riddle
July 21, 2017

Actors, are you easy to find?

by Fran Montano
July 18, 2017

Energic Dogs Need Variety

by Gerie Rhosen
July 16, 2017

The Power of One….mentor

by Jessie Marcus
July 14, 2017

“Betty Rox the World of Dancehall”

by Luckie
July 12, 2017

Kiva Garber-Maikovska’s Dog Furs Fury

by Raleigh Barrett
July 07, 2017

How to Move Out of Your Parents House

by Lillian Appleby
July 03, 2017

Horoscopes - July 2017

by Maya White
June 28, 2017

Very Independent Filmmaking and the Art of Hovering

by Samantha Simmonds-Ronceros
Friday, 03 March 2017 07:15

Get Out; Post-Oscar Reflections

Get Out; Post-Oscar Reflections

Published in Movie Reviews

Sully; The Magnificent Seven…and Dan Duryea (!) by Mike Peros

Published in Movie Reviews
Thursday, 15 August 2013 08:01

Movie Review - Elysium, 2 Guns

elysium-movie-images-hd-12.jpg - 1.00 MB

The new sci-fi action drama Elysium convincingly depicts a bleak future in which the world is separated into two classes, where the wealthy get to enjoy the highest standards of health care while the rest are left to fend for themselves under increasingly impersonal, hostile conditions—wait a minute, that sounds pretty much like today. In fact, one might think that this latest film from District 9’s director Neill Blomkamp is another attempt to make an allegory for our times under the guise of science fiction.

Published in Archived Movie Reviews

Denzel Washington and his charisma glide through director Daniel Espinosa’s Safe House, a sporadically exciting (not for lack of trying) action thriller that puts an exceptional cast (Brendan Gleeson, Vera Farmiga, Sam Shepard) at the mercy of a pretty flimsy script with fairly predictable twists. Ryan Reynolds (it’s been a busy year for Ryan—he should take a break) is a naïve, reluctant CIA operative stuck in the thankless job of being “innkeeper” at a CIA safe house in South Africa. After rogue ex-CIA agent Washington is apprehended and brought to the safe house to be interrogated (read tortured), some armed and very dangerous men breach security and manage to kill everyone except for Reynolds and his handcuffed prisoner Washington, who manage to escape amid the carnage. From here on in, the chases come semi-fast and furious (the automatic weapon-toting henchmen remind me of the armies in the Rambo films who manage to hit everything in sight-except their intended target) as the intrepid duo test each others’ mettle—not to say allegiances- while attempting to evade their murderous pursuers—who come in all shapes, sizes and nationalities. The movie works best in the scenes between Washington’s enigmatic, lethal prisoner with secrets and Reynolds’ reluctant captor. Washington is entertaining, even here on auto-pilot and brings out the “best” in Reynolds, who is earnest but overmatched; Gleeson, Farmiga and Shepard invest their roles with some verve and more than a little bite—almost successfully persuading us that they’re not marking time until something of value comes along.

In Joe Carnahan’s The Grey, a plane carrying an oil drilling team crashes in the freezing Alaskan wilderness and seven survivors led by a grizzled, grim Liam Neeson (well, let’s face it, after working for this “team” as a wolf-killer, crash-landing and enduring dream-like flashbacks whose real import isn’t made clear till the end—he’s got reasons to be gloomy) try to survive despite the cold—and several wolves who would like to make a meal out of them (poetic justice?) One can see that The Grey is not aspiring to be a standard action adventure: the pace is a little deliberate and the opening scenes with the dispirited men at work and play in the harsh landscape, present an atmosphere of despair-even before the harrowing crash. Unfortunately, the lugubrious pacing continues after the crash, and on through the survivors’ attempt to elude the murderous wolves (hopefully avoiding the wolves’ den) and to live to fight another day. If this were a Twilight Zone episode, the trek would have been over in a half-hour, ending with the requisite (and in this case, not-too surprising) twist. However, Carnahan’s man vs. the elements saga aims for something deeper, as in a treatise on nature, faith, despair, and survival. This is fine, as long as the participants’ actions and dialogue are occasionally interesting. However, the clichés are lurking as much as the wolves: who’ll fall behind and be killed; who’ll drop his guard while standing watch and wind up as wolf-chow; who’ll go on and on about his family before a life and death situation-in which he comes out on the short end. (WARNING -SEMI-SPOLER ALERT COMING) Where the film departs from cliché is at the very end. If you’ve seen the ads, you’ve seen the picture of a determined Neeson poised to go mano a mano with the wolves. What Carnahan (as writer and director) does with this situation might cause you to feel you are either in the presence of a cinematic innovator—or feel cheated (I am in the latter category). However it makes you feel, be sure to stay until after the closing credits.

Published in Archived Movie Reviews

Do you have an event, video or news to share?  Drop us an email and you may see it on NoHoArtsDistrict.com