"This
article appears courtesy of the New York
Foundation for the Arts (NYFA). For
additional information about NYFA, please
visit www.nyfa.org or email nyfaweb@nyfa.org"
In October
2003, the New York based Gender Project
conducted a two-day retreat for dance
artists, educators, administrators, and
presenters at Jacob’s Pillow in
Massachusetts.
The
intention was to stimulate a conversation
about disparities in the distribution of
opportunities and support between men and
women in the dance field. Participants
included Gender Project Board members Janis
Brenner, Ariel Weiss Holyst, Kristen
Mangione, Romy Reading, JoAnna Mendl Shaw,
Jill Sigman, and Cynthia Williams; and
guests Ella Baff (Executive Director,
Jacob’s Pillow), Asimina Chremos
(Choreographer and Director of Links
Hall/Chicago), Penelope Dannenberg (Director
of Programs, NYFA), Lawrence Rhodes (Dance
Department Chair, The Juilliard School), and
Robert Yesselman (Director, Dance/NYC). Amy
Schwartzman (Arts Consultant, Attorney, and
Gender Project Advisor) served as
facilitator.
Gender Project co-founder JoAnna Mendl Shaw
is Artistic Director of The Equus Projects,
and a dance educator at The Ailey School and
Juilliard. She spoke with NYFA Program
Officer Edith Meeks about the origins of the
Gender Project and some of the questions it
is raising.
Edith Meeks: Would you describe the
Gender Project—how it got started and what
are its goals and activities?
JoAnna Mendl Shaw: The Gender Project
started in 1998 out of an informal
conversation with Ellis Wood. We were at a
Dance Theater Workshop panel on Eastern
European choreographic projects and were
puzzled by how few female choreographers
were present. We noted that female
representation was sparse in all top
echelons of the field. I shared with Ellis
an experience with one of my mentors, Bessie
Shoenberg. I had asked Bessie if I could
assist her at Jacob’s Pillow and she said,
"You know, JoAnna, you’re a fabulous
teacher, but there’s nothing like a man to
get those young girls started in the
morning." I was alarmed and wrote her a
letter saying, "Bessie, you’re an icon in
this field and it is disturbing that you
feel this way." It was at that point that I
began thinking about my own career, how
gender issues might have affected my work. I
began to wonder just how pervasive gender
prejudice was in the dance field.
Ellis and I decided to find out how other
dancers felt about gender disparity. We
conducted one on one interviews with a wide
variety of choreographers, male and female:
David Dorfman, John Jasperse, Marni Thomas,
Elisa Monte, Elizabeth Streb, Delia Peters,
who had been a principal with New York City
Ballet, as well as numerous young dancers
from the downtown dance scene. We began to
take action and gain a voice in the dance
community. We organized panel discussions.
We met with Susan Jonas who had spearheaded
a study through NYSCA on women in theater.
We spoke at the Women in Theater conference
and on a DTW panel on gender.
We launched a research project that
choreographer Janis Brenner initiated, to
look at both New York and national
statistics and compare male and female
representation. Wishing to disseminate these
statistics in an unusual and very visible
way, we created a performance project titled
Women Hitting the Wall and featuring Janis
Brenner as Narrator. Reading of statistics
became the thread that wove together a
series of solos. We did four versions of
Women Hitting the Wall in New York, one in
Chicago, and one in Philadelphia. The
performances always concluded with a
facilitated discussion.
EM: What were some of the statistical
disparities that you found in your research?
JMS: We found that the Kennedy Center
roster is entirely men. American Dance
Festival—their choreographers are
predominantly men, if not entirely. Their
teaching faculty is very slanted towards
men. If you look at the vast majority of
artistic directors of major companies, they
are men. And this boils down to money. With
an annual budget of $100,000 or under, there
are plenty of women. Any time the budget is
$500,000 to $1 million, most often there is
a male artistic director. There are a few
exceptions, but not many.
People who are making major decisions about
both the presenting and the creation of the
art are men. And yet the women in numbers
dominate the lower echelons of this field.
They are the ones who do the teaching, run
the local studios. If you look at student
bodies: the NYU Tisch, Purchase, Alvin Ailey
Fordham programs are predominately female.
This year the Ailey Fordham senior class is
graduating one man and fifteen women.
Why is it that early in their careers men
are given more opportunities? Is their work
more interesting? As a teacher I frequently
find that the men’s work is more edgy and
daring. Why? Most men start dancing later
than women and are singled out and
encouraged in ways that young women are not.
They have not been taught to be obedient.
They are taught to ask questions. Men are
what Kay Cummings , former Dance Chair at
NYU Tisch, called "the endangered species."
The men are nurtured because they are one
amongst many. With more attention, more
encouragement, they come away from their
training with more confidence and begin
their careers with an emotional fortitude
that many women do not have.
In 2000, the Juilliard Liberal Arts program
invited me to come and talk with the acting,
music and dance majors about gender issues
in the dance field and about the Gender
Project. The Juilliard students shared many
stories about gender disparity. One young
female pianist told us that pianos are not
built for the hand span of a woman. The size
of an octave puts women at a disadvantage.
Also women do not have the strength to
create the fierce, percussive sound that is
currently sought after in piano
competitions. There is a parallel in dance.
The extreme athleticism that is highly
valued in dance today does not tend to be
the signature for many female
choreographers.
EM: My mother, who was discouraged
from pursuing an academic career, used to
say that women shouldn't be ministers
because they didn't have deep enough voices.
It’s interesting to me that you get that
kind of thinking reflected back from women
who've been on the receiving end.
JMS: Our interviews with dancers
revealed that gender prejudice exists deeply
in women. This finding also emerges in the
NYSCA study on women in theatre. Women tend
to listen to other women differently than
they listen to men, resulting in a
self-effacing acceptance of a secondary
role. Conversely if women choose to behave
with more assertiveness their behavior is
often interpreted as pushy or abrasive,
while the same behavior in a man would
simply be seen as ambitious and inspiring.
A lot of gender discussions have surrounded
the subject of money – one’s value being
measured by money earning capacity. Dance is
not a lucrative field to begin with. If a
man chooses this field, he will go for the
gold, get as much mileage out of every
opportunity as he can, promote himself
aggressively and effectively. Women are not
taught to be self-promoters. Many women find
it hard to combine business and personal
life. They do multi-track, often at an
unmanageable rate. Or they are faced with
simply not having a personal life. Women are
also working against a biological time
clock. Gus Solomons, Jr. talked to my Ailey
Seniors about his career and pointed out
that years ago one did not have to construct
this sort of mega-career. You could just be
a dancer. Today you have to attend to
selling your work, selling yourself,
fundraising, audience development and the
social consciousness of your work.
EM: How did the conversation develop
among dancers, presenters, and
administrators at the Jacob’s Pillow
retreat?
JMS: The discussion was revealing,
sometimes heated. We did not always agree.
It was acknowledged that men tend to aim for
more visible venues with higher budgets,
their work is presented with greater
production values and that men’s work has a
physicality that appeals to a wider
audience. In the long run they do get more
work and receive higher commissioning fees.
We came away from the Retreat having
fostered a dialogue between dancers and
decision-makers in the field furthering an
awareness of the complexity of the issue.
Juilliard Dance Chair Larry Rhodes took our
discussions to heart in his selection of
choreographers for the Juilliard fall 2004
season; Gender Project information and
statistics were included on the Dance/NYC
website; and we received an invitation from
Dance/USA to continue this discussion on a
national level at the June 2004 Conference
in Pittsburgh.
Information on the Gender Project and
statistics on the participation of men and
women in the dance field are posted on the
Dance/NYC site in the Documents section
under Hot Topics, www.dancenyc.org.
Transcripts from the Gender Project
interviews can be read in the Oral History
Collection of the Performing Arts Branch of
the New York Public Library. The NYSCA
report on the Status of Women in Theatre
report may be viewed on the Fund for Women
Artists site, at http://www.womenarts.org/advocacy/WomenCountNYSCAReport.htm.
|