"This
article appears courtesy of the New York Foundation for
the Arts (NYFA). For additional information about NYFA,
please visit
www.nyfa.org or email
nyfaweb@nyfa.org"
Artist in the Community
By Bill Rauch
All art is community-based. Whether it’s a
multi-million-dollar commercial venture or a
neighborhood youth project, all art is rooted in
community. So how as artists do we take responsibility
for the ways in which our work is connected to our
communities? Consciously or not, we are constantly
addressing three questions with our artistic work:
What’s being communicated? Who’s doing the
communicating? To whom is it being communicated?
Different artists begin to answer these questions in a
different order. At Cornerstone Theater Company, for
instance, we always start with the audience or the “to
whom” (our collaborating community); from there, we
build who’s doing the communicating (selecting the
artists), and finally, what’s being communicated
(artistic content). But whatever the order in which they
are approached, artists ultimately have to answer all
three questions.
But let’s back up for a moment and define community. Or
rather, let’s acknowledge that the first step in
building a work of art in collaboration with a community
is to define that community. As individuals, our
identities are almost infinitely complex and fluid, and
at any given moment we may choose to self-identify with
communities different from the ones with which others
identify us. And yet, an artist defining a community is
starting with the notion of something shared by a group
of people: perhaps the geographic boundaries of a town
or neighborhood, perhaps a shared ethnicity or language,
or perhaps even something as deliberately random as a
shared birthday.
The impetus behind a project may come from a member of
the community or from an outside artist, or from an
individual who is both a professional artist and a
community member. Wherever the initial idea comes from,
however, the project will have the best chances of
success through the building of strong partnerships. All
communities have cohesion but also divisions. The
artist’s job is often to reach out to multiple
constituencies, to collaborate with as many sectors of
the community as possible.
Respect is the single most important principle in
creating a work of art in collaboration with a
community. A professional artist working in a community
setting brings a valuable set of art-making skills and
past experience as an art-maker. A community participant
brings to the table the equally valuable asset of life
experience as a member of that community. For the
project to flourish, the artist must recognize the value
of what the community offers, respecting the needs,
issues, and traditions of the community as embodied in
its members.
Respect is best manifested through listening: not mere
politely-nodding listening, but hardcore, deep, “I’m
willing to rethink my entire way of looking at the
world” listening. As you listen, remember that each
encounter with a member of your collaborating community,
however unlikely a collaborator on the surface, may
carry the key that unlocks the heart of your artwork—and
often, in the process, changes your life.
A few questions and practical steps in building a work
of art with a community:
Why does the project need to exist? Is there a burning
community issue or need? Who are the stakeholders in the
question at hand? What are the multiple contexts,
including the historical context? Keep your process open
enough to be surprised and to reverse the expectations
you start with.
Identify a community liaison or, better yet, a group of
community advisors that represent the diversity within
the community you want represented in your project. Meet
with them on a regular basis, keeping them informed, and
seeking their input at every stage of the project’s
life. Seek unlikely alliances.
Meet with members of the community to learn what’s at
stake for community members, and ultimately to develop
the content of your artwork. Judith Baca of Social &
Public Art Resource Center in Venice, California, has a
useful principle in her community-based mural-making:
the community has final responsibility for content,
while the artist has final responsibility for the
aesthetic form in which that content is communicated.
One-on-one interviews, story circles, and workshops are
possible ways to interact. Set clear guidelines and
boundaries about ownership of material that is generated
so that no one feels taken advantage of.
Spend as much time in the community as you possibly can,
not only through formal meetings for your project, but
also informally. Walk the streets, attend religious
services, eat in the restaurants. Go where people
gather, share, and listen. Food is a great way to bring
people together.
If you are creating with members of the community who
are nonprofessional or first-time artists, recognize and
respect the many pressures that your collaborators will
be balancing along with their participation in your art,
including school, work, and family. Time management is
often the single biggest challenge in working with
community collaborators.
Seek partnerships with other artists or groups of
artists, when appropriate. A cross-disciplinary approach
may deepen your efforts.
Share the work with an audience that is community-based.
Don’t “create and run.” Once the artwork is created,
what will be left behind? Are there skills that can be
imparted through the process? What about
capacity-building, materials, or other resources? How
can you maximize the chances that more art will be
created in this community?
Perhaps you see divisions within a community and want to
help build bridges across those differences. Perhaps you
want to celebrate the lives of ordinary citizens.
Perhaps you want to challenge certain accepted values.
Perhaps you simply want to start with a blank canvas and
begin to explore from scratch with a group of fellow
human beings. Whatever your starting point, community
collaboration is a journey that will take you to
unexpected and deeply rewarding places. In my
experience, it is always hard and always worth it. As
artists, we have the ongoing opportunity to set an
example about how to remake the world. Let’s get to
work.
Bibliography
Boal, Augusto. Theatre of the Oppressed. Trans.
Charles A. and Maria-Odilia Leal McBride. New York:
Theatre Communications Group, 1985.
General theory/practice of theater that resists social
dominance. Related, but not necessarily exclusive to,
community-based arts.
Broyles-Gonzalez, Yvonne. El Teatro Campesino:
Theater in the Chicano Movement. Austin: University
of Texas Press, 1994.
Though somewhat academic and focused on a particular
company, Broyles-Gonzalez’s book is a useful history of
this important ensemble movement.
Burnham, Linda Frye and Steven Durland, eds. Citizen
Artist: Twenty Years of Art in the Public Arena.
Gardiner, NY: Critical Press, 1998.
This collection of essays and interviews addresses a
wide range of topics relating to public art projects.
“Of the People, By the People, For the People: The Field
of Community Performance” by Richard Owen Geer is an
especially useful introduction.
Cocke, Dudley, Harry Newman, and Janet Salmons-Rue, eds.
From the Ground Up: Grassroots Theater in Historical
and Contemporary Perspective. Ithaca: Cornell
University, 1993. Excellent summary of conference
focusing on community-based theater.
Cohen-Cruz, Jan. “A Hyphenated Field: Community-Based
Theater in the USA.” New Theatre Quarterly 16.4 (2000):
364-378.
A recent, concise overview.
Cohen-Cruz, Jan, ed. Radical Street Performance: An
International Anthology. New York: Routledge, 1998.
An extensive array of writings by scholars, activists,
performers, directors, critics, and journalists on
performance in Europe, Africa, China, India, and both
the Americas, describing engagement with issues as
diverse as abortion, colonialism, the environment, and
homophobia, to name a few.
Kershaw, Baz. Politics of Performance: Radical
Theater as Cultural Intervention. New York:
Routledge, 1992.
Kershaw theorizes the social-change potential of radical
community-based theater in England in the latter half of
the 20th century.
Kuftinec, Sonja. Staging America: Cornerstone and
Community-Based Theater. Carbondale: Southern
Illinois University Press, 2003.
Includes excellent historical background on
community-based theater, along with Cornerstone Theatre
case studies and theory around the field in general.
Lacy, Suzanne. Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public
Art. Washington: Bay Press, 1996.
This book is more about public art in general than
theater. It deals with the role of the critic and the
history of public art practice in the late 20th-century
United States.
O’Brien, Mark and Craig Little, eds. Reimagining
America: The Arts of Social Change. Santa Cruz: New
Society Publishers, 1990.
Includes a broad range of social-based art forms,
including community theater.
Rohd, Michael. Theatre for Community, Conflict and
Dialogue. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Press, 1998.
The purpose of this manual is to provide a clear look at
the process and specifics involved in the “Hope Is
Vital” interactive theater techniques. The organization
is sequential, providing a blueprint for creating a
workable plan.
www.communityarts.net
The Community Arts Network (CAN) supports the belief
that the arts are an integral part of a healthy culture,
providing both intellectual nourishment and social
benefit, and that community-based arts provide
significant value both to communities and artists.
Bill Rauch is artistic director and co-founder of
Cornerstone Theater Company. He has directed over 40 of
the company’s productions, many of them collaborations
with diverse communities within Cornerstone’s home city
of Los Angeles and across the nation. Representative
works include Steelbound, a collaboration with former
steelworkers and Touchstone Theatre in the empty iron
foundry of the Bethlehem Steel plant in Bethlehem, PA;
The Central Ave. Chalk Circle, the culmination of
a 15-month residency in the LA neighborhood of Watts and
winner of LA’s Ovation Award for Best Production of the
Year; and A Community Carol, an Arena Stage
mainstage production in collaboration with communities
east of the Anacostia River. Rauch has also directed
Anthony Clarvoe’s contemporary adaptation of The Wild
Duck and Alison Carey’s adaptation of Peter Pan
at Great Lakes Theatre Festival, a commissioned
community collaboration with residents of New Haven on
the Long Wharf Theatre mainstage. He directed
Cornerstone’s largest-ever community collaboration,
For Here or to Go?, as a special holiday event on
the mainstage of the Mark Taper Forum. In recent years,
Rauch directed the world premiere of Lisa Loomer’s
Living Out at the Taper, Robert Schenkkan’s
Handler, and the world premiere of Jerry Turner’s
adaptation of Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler at the Oregon
Shakespeare Festival. He also conceived and co-directed
Medea/Macbeth/Cinderella, the season-opening show
of new artistic director James Bundy’s tenure at Yale
Repertory Theater.
Rauch sat on the board of Theatre Communications Group,
the national service organization for professional
nonprofit theatres, from 1992—1998 (member of executive
committee, 1996—98), and has served as a peer panelist
for the National Endowment for the Arts, the California
Arts Council, the Los Angeles County Music and
Performing Arts Commission, The Durfee Foundation, the
Very Special Arts “Art & Soul” Festival, and the
Playwrights Center.
Rauch gave the keynote address at Theatre Puget Sound’s
inaugural conference. In April of 1999, he testified to
the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the NEA. In
1994, he was one of four US-based artists chosen for the
TCG International Observership Grant to Mexico. Rauch
has lectured extensively about community-based art and
Cornerstone's methodology, and most recently taught a
course in directing at the University of California at
Los Angeles. Rauch has won L.A. Weekly, Garland,
Drama-Logue, and Helen Hayes awards for his direction of
Cornerstone shows, as well as having been nominated for
Emmy and Ovation awards. He has been nominated for both
the CalArts Herb Alpert Award (twice) and the
Rockefeller Foundation’s Next Generation Network, and
was the only artist to win the inaugural Leadership for
A Changing World Award.
|
|